Geometry Dash Expanded Wiki:Propose new articles: Difference between revisions

From Geometry Dash Expanded Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "Category:Site articles This page is for editors to propose new secondary articles in Class B (community content) categories for staff to evaluate in conjunction with the '''article creation policy'''. You should ''clearly understand'' this policy, else the likelihood of your proposal succeeding will be significantly lower. ==Process== Only editors who have verified their account by confirming an email address will be allowed to edi..."
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:Site articles]]
[[Category:Site articles]]
This page is for editors to propose new secondary articles in Class B (community content) categories for staff to evaluate in conjunction with the '''[[Meta:Policy#Article creation-0|article creation policy]]'''. You should ''clearly understand'' this policy, else the likelihood of your proposal succeeding will be significantly lower.
This page is for editors to propose new secondary articles in Class B (community content) categories for staff to evaluate in conjunction with the '''[[Meta:Policy#tabber-Article_creation|article creation policy]]'''. You should ''clearly understand'' this policy, else the likelihood of your proposal succeeding will be significantly lower.


==Process==
==Process==

Latest revision as of 00:04, 13 October 2026

This page is for editors to propose new secondary articles in Class B (community content) categories for staff to evaluate in conjunction with the article creation policy. You should clearly understand this policy, else the likelihood of your proposal succeeding will be significantly lower.

Process

[edit source]

Only editors who have verified their account by confirming an email address will be allowed to edit this page. You will need to complete the three italicised column cells of a row under Editor submission of the table below to submit an edit for review. You will need to:

  • Specify the proposed article and its category
  • Provide reasoning for the proposal in conjunction with the article creation policy pertaining to the aforementioned specified category
  • Provide your username for quick reference (there is no need to link to it)

If it was not obvious, messing around with this page in areas not explicitly stated above, or not making genuine submissions will result in penalties. Refer to site policy for more details.

The remaining three cells of a row under Staff response will be completed by a staff member who may either approve or deny the proposal, complemented by any notes, or a request for more information. It is acceptable to contact that staff member and make further enquiries on their talk page if you feel that you would like to follow up on the matter if the outcome was not to your satisfaction. Completed reviews will remain present within the table until it is decided to archive them.

Review list

[edit source]
Editor submission Staff response
Proposed article + category Description Submitted by Status Reviewed by Notes
Spike It Off, Levels This level blew up in level downloads and people trying it on YouTube after it was seen being played by Taylor Swift in the recent documentary. The level isn't yet rated though ExampleUserA Approved pending relative completion ExampleAdmin The article can proceed, but must be developed comprehensively to high presentable standard, being essentially 'complete', within the next 7 days. Include in the description more about the context of how the level gained attention.
xX0h10R1zzl3r67Xx, Players My channel is about 69k subscribers away from 1M and I have hundreds of uploads of gd shorts each getting millions of views, and I have some rated levels ExampleUserB Denied ExampleAdmin Although the channel can be described as relatively successful, it has been assessed as specialising in short-form video, which may generate views, and effectively embraces content creation trends, but the player is not prolific among the GD community and has not had any impact on the state of the game or playerbase. There would be little to include on such an article that could make it of wider interest to wiki viewers, reflected by what minimal relevant information has so far been included on the draft. Unfortunately, the article will be removed shortly.